Libraries Are Dead LLMs Are Compilers DeepWiki Enables Ripping Code Out of Thin Air
The Rise of DeepWiki: Code as an Immediate Q&A Source
The landscape of software discovery and utilization is undergoing a seismic shift, driven by the synthesis of large language models (LLMs) and purpose-built code indexing tools. As detailed in recent commentary by @karpathy on February 11, 2026, at 5:12 PM UTC, the barrier to understanding complex codebases is rapidly dissolving. Initially, tools like DeepWiki offered a streamlined utility: auto-building comprehensive wiki pages directly from GitHub repositories. This feature alone provided instant utility, allowing users to bypass often-stale or incomplete official documentation. For instance, by simply swapping "github" for "deepwiki" in a repository URL, one gains immediate, interactive Q&A capabilities against the live source code, as demonstrated with projects like nanochat.
This direct interaction—asking specific questions like how exactly does torchao implement fp8 training?—highlights the core benefit: the code itself becomes the definitive source of truth. Where human-authored documentation is prone to lag or inaccuracy, LLMs, when properly grounded via platforms like DeepWiki, can interpret the source structure, logic, and intent with increasing fidelity. This capability positions LLMs not merely as codex search engines but as sophisticated interpreters bridging the gap between dense machine instructions and human comprehension, fundamentally changing how developers query existing software solutions.
Agents, DeepWiki, and the Power of Functional Extraction
The next evolution in this workflow moves beyond human consumption toward fully autonomous agentic operations. Instead of a human consulting DeepWiki for answers, the agent is granted direct access, often mediated through advanced platforms like the "MCP" (Meta-Control Protocol, implied). This shift transforms the process from querying information to actively re-engineering functionality. A compelling recent case study involved an issue with implementing fp8 training using the torchao library. The suspicion was that the required functionality was far simpler than the monolithic dependency suggested.
An agent was tasked with a specific, powerful command sequence: "Use DeepWiki MCP and GitHub CLI to look at how torchao implements fp8 training. Is it possible to 'rip out' the functionality? Implement nanochat/fp8.py that has identical API but is fully self-contained." The outcome was transformative. Within minutes, the agent returned 150 lines of clean, functional code that passed tests showing equivalent—and surprisingly, 3% faster—results compared to the original library integration.
This extraction process illuminated layers of subtle implementation details that are often critical but poorly documented: esoteric tricks surrounding numerics, specific dtype handling, interactions with meta devices, and the complex interplay with torch.compile. The agent successfully isolated the necessary logic, eliminating the need to carry the entire, heavy dependency of torchao into the nanochat project. This ability to perform precise functional excision—the "rip out"—is proving more economical and illuminating than traditional integration methods.
The agentic command structure, summarized as "Look at X, rip out Y, implement Z," represents a new paradigm in software modularity. It implies that complexity is no longer locked within necessary dependencies but is instead optional cargo, available for disassembly only when required for a specific task.
Ripping Functionality Out of Thin Air
The central value proposition here is the ability to extract precise, tailored functionality without inheriting the baggage—the sprawling dependencies, tangential features, and maintenance overhead—associated with large libraries. This process feels akin to molecular surgery, separating only the necessary enzyme from the complex biological system it originated from.
This workflow strongly informs a potential future direction for software design itself. If agents are capable of economically extracting precise modules, developers might be incentivized to actively structure their codebases to facilitate this separation. This encourages the building of "bacterial code": software components that are inherently self-contained, dependency-light, stateless, and easy to decouple.
The philosophical challenge posed by this capability is direct: If an agent can isolate 150 lines of performance-critical code from a megabyte-sized library, does the original project truly require its 100MB dependency footprint for that specific feature? This fluidity suggests a move away from large, centralized artifact distribution toward on-demand, highly customized code synthesis.
Libraries Are Over, LLMs Are the New Compiler
The confluence of powerful agents and DeepWiki's grounding capabilities renders certain types of traditional software integration economically obsolete. Processes that previously required days of painstaking manual investigation, dependency mapping, and debugging—the cost of which was often higher than the feature itself—are now achievable in minutes. This fundamentally increases the malleability and fluidity of software creation and maintenance.
The provocative conclusion drawn from these developments is that the role of the LLM, when coupled with agentic orchestration, is beginning to mirror that of the traditional compiler or linker, but for a different purpose. Instead of linking object files together based on manifest declarations, the LLM/Agent stack links conceptual functionality extracted from diverse sources, synthesizing entirely new, highly specialized components on demand. The library, as a static bundle of functionality, is challenged by the dynamic possibility of on-the-fly extraction and refinement.
This report is based on the digital updates shared on X. We've synthesized the core insights to keep you ahead of the marketing curve.