Bing Webmaster Tools Unleashes AI Performance Reporting: Are You Seeing This Yet?
AI Performance Reporting Arrives in Bing Webmaster Tools
A significant shift in how SEO professionals measure success within the Microsoft ecosystem appears to be underway. Experienced observers of the search landscape are starting to report access to a brand-new reporting suite within Bing Webmaster Tools (BWT), specifically focused on AI Performance.
Announcement of Recent Access
The buzz began on Feb 10, 2026 · 5:41 PM UTC, when industry commentator @glenngabe shared the initial intelligence that they had successfully accessed the feature, signaling a major update to BWT’s analytical capabilities. This confirmation has immediately sent a ripple of excitement and urgency through the SEO community, which has long anticipated dedicated metrics for performance driven by generative AI outputs.
Speculation on Rollout Scale
While the initial report was anecdotal, the speed with which similar reports often follow suggests a broader, potentially wide-scale rollout. Is this a staggered geographic release, or has Microsoft flipped the switch for all premium or active users? The collective instinct among analysts is that if one seasoned user has it, many more are likely to gain access in the immediate future.
Urgency for Users to Check Accounts
For any organization heavily invested in optimizing content for Bing and its integrated AI experiences—such as Copilot integrations leveraging search grounding—the message is clear: check your Bing Webmaster Tools dashboard immediately. These new metrics could offer the first tangible proof points of how AI models are currently citing or utilizing proprietary website content. Ignoring this early access window could mean missing crucial insights into real-time AI indexing behavior.
Core Components of the New Reporting Suite
The newly surfaced AI Performance reports move beyond traditional SEO metrics, focusing instead on the direct interplay between a website’s content and the generative AI systems drawing from it. The structure seems geared toward quantifying 'grounding'—the process where AI models use verifiable sources to formulate answers.
Total Citations and Cited Pages Overview
At the top level, the new dashboard provides high-level visibility into the AI’s engagement with the site:
- Total Citations: This metric quantifies the absolute number of times Bing’s AI features referenced content originating from the domain. This acts as a primary indicator of overall visibility within the AI stack.
- Cited Pages: This offers a count of the unique URLs across the site that have served as sources for these AI-generated answers. Understanding which pages are being prioritized by the AI is invaluable for content strategy adjustment.
Grounding Query Analysis
Perhaps the most insightful feature introduced is the granularity offered at the query level, linking direct user intent to specific content utilization.
- Seeing Specific Queries: Users can now drill down to see the exact search queries that prompted an AI response that ultimately resulted in a citation back to their site. This is a significant step beyond standard query data, as it reflects success in answering a user’s need through an AI intermediary.
- Breakdown of Citations Per Query: The system provides the volume of citations generated from responses to a single grounding query. This helps identify high-value informational gaps that the site uniquely fills for the AI.
Citation-Based Page Breakdown
Complementing the query analysis is a structured report that pivots the data view back to the owned assets:
- This report segments all pages on the site based on the cumulative number of citations they have accrued within the reporting period.
- This segmentation allows SEO teams to instantly identify their top-performing 'AI anchors'—the pages that are most frequently deemed authoritative enough by the model to be cited. Conversely, it highlights pages that are indexed but rarely utilized by the AI outputs.
Missing Metrics and Future Expectations
While the introduction of any AI-specific reporting is cause for celebration, the current iteration clearly reflects a "Version 1.0" status, according to initial feedback. Several core metrics that SEOs rely on for holistic performance analysis are notably absent.
Explicit Statement Regarding Current Lack of Click-Through Rate (CTR) Data
The most conspicuous omission noted by early testers is the lack of any Click-Through Rate (CTR) data associated with these AI citations. Currently, publishers can see that they were cited, but not how often a user who saw that citation actually clicked through to the source page.
Identification of the Absence of Traditional Traffic Metrics
Furthermore, the report appears strictly focused on attribution rather than traffic volume. Traditional metrics such as raw clicks, impressions, or session volume derived from these citations are not present in this specialized view. This reinforces the idea that this tool is designed to measure influence on the AI layer, rather than direct referral traffic from traditional SERPs.
Discussion on General Sentiment
The general sentiment is one of cautious optimism. The SEO community recognizes this as a monumental first step—providing metrics for a channel that was previously a complete black box. However, the consensus is that this initial release is insufficient for comprehensive performance management.
"It’s a start," as noted by the source, "but we really should see more IMO."
The expectation is that future iterations will integrate these new citation counts with existing BWT data streams, ultimately providing context on whether increased AI citation leads to higher organic clicks or simply influences the user before they ever reach a traditional link. Until then, SEOs must treat these citation counts as a leading indicator of authority within the AI ecosystem, rather than a direct measure of traffic ROI.
This report is based on the digital updates shared on X. We've synthesized the core insights to keep you ahead of the marketing curve.