Apple's AI Dream Stalls: Siri Stumbles Again, Outsourcing Core Features to ChatGPT?
Persistent Hurdles Plague Apple's Revamped Siri Launch
The highly anticipated overhaul of Apple's digital assistant, Siri, designed to bring it into a competitive era of generative AI, has reportedly hit another significant roadblock, prompting further internal reassessments and postponements. This news, relayed by sources speaking on condition of anonymity due to the sensitive nature of ongoing development, underscores the immense challenge Apple faces in catching up to its rivals.
Internal testing has uncovered fundamental flaws that are proving resistant to quick fixes. Specifically, the revised system suffers from slow processing times, leading to frustrating delays for users attempting simple commands. More critically, the software demonstrates a worrying propensity for inaccurate query interpretation. Even minor ambiguities in user requests appear to derail the assistant, suggesting that the underlying language models are not yet sufficiently robust for real-world application. This recurring pattern of delays, confirmed most recently on Feb 11, 2026 · 8:24 PM UTC following reporting shared by @glenngabe, paints a picture of a project struggling under the weight of its own lofty ambitions.
The Performance Gap Revealed
The setbacks aren't merely about speed; they speak to the core capability of Apple's proprietary artificial intelligence engine. The persistent issues suggest that the foundational work on on-device processing and contextual understanding is lagging behind industry benchmarks.
| Testing Metric | Observed Issue | Implication |
|---|---|---|
| Latency | Excessive wait times for responses | Poor user experience; rejection of the tool |
| Accuracy | Frequent misinterpretation of intent | Need for more extensive training data/models |
| Fallback Behavior | Reliance on external partners | Underperformance of native R&D efforts |
Reliance on External AI Solutions Raises Concerns
Perhaps the most telling sign of the struggle within Apple’s AI division is the growing—and sometimes involuntary—dependence on external large language models (LLMs). Reports indicate that the so-called "new Siri" frequently defaults to utilizing the integration with OpenAI's ChatGPT.
This fallback mechanism is particularly alarming when it activates for tasks that Apple’s engineers had explicitly stated would be handled entirely by their own, privacy-focused, on-device or proprietary cloud-based AI. Why is Apple’s native technology failing to execute basic instructions when it should theoretically be the superior, bespoke solution? This reliance raises serious questions about the maturity and limitations of Apple's own foundational models developed under strict secrecy. If the system defaults to ChatGPT for tasks Siri should be capable of managing alone, it suggests Apple’s homegrown AI is either severely underperforming or simply incomplete.
The Third-Party Crutch
The implication is stark: Apple may be forced to market a hybrid system where the true intelligence is borrowed, undermining the narrative of complete technological superiority Apple typically projects. This reliance contradicts the vision of a truly integrated, self-sufficient 'Apple Intelligence' ecosystem, forcing the company to lean on a competitor’s infrastructure even for core functionality.
Personal Intelligence Features Face Significant Delays
The most feature-rich, and arguably most valuable, component of the revamped Siri—the promised 'Personal Intelligence' layer—is bearing the brunt of these development headaches. This capability hinges on Siri’s ability to securely index and understand a user’s personal data across applications, a complex integration requiring flawless execution and ironclad privacy safeguards.
The feature most likely to face the axe, or at least the most substantial delay, involves the expanded ability for Siri to deeply tap into personal data streams. A prime example illustrating the complexity is the proposed capability allowing users to ask the assistant to search old text messages to locate a specific podcast shared by a friend and immediately begin playback. Executing this sequence requires deep cross-application access, precise contextual memory, and nuanced language understanding—a monumental software engineering feat that appears to be proving too ambitious for the current launch window.
Market Reception and Timeline Uncertainty
The cumulative effect of these technical snags has created an atmosphere of skepticism among observers. As one external commentator succinctly put it, expressing widespread industry fatigue, "Apple is so bad at AI... it's not even funny at this point." This sentiment, shared widely in tech circles, speaks volumes about the perceived gap between Apple’s marketing promises and its visible technological execution.
The latest reported timeline update, anchored to the reporting from Feb 11, 2026, provides little solace to developers and customers alike who have been anticipating a significant leap forward. With internal testing revealing deep-seated issues in core processing and an over-reliance on external LLMs, the uncertainty surrounding the final, stable release date continues to grow, casting a shadow over one of Apple's most crucial software initiatives. The question remains: Will the final product be the AI revolution promised, or a patched-together assistant relying heavily on borrowed intelligence?
Source: Details derived from reporting shared by @glenngabe on Feb 11, 2026 · 8:24 PM UTC: https://x.com/glenngabe/status/2021681734333432020
This report is based on the digital updates shared on X. We've synthesized the core insights to keep you ahead of the marketing curve.